Studying unconscious processing: Contention and consensus

The scope of unconscious processing has long been, and still remains, a hotly debated issue. This is driven in part by the current diversity of methods to manipulate and measure perceptual consciousne…
Authors

François Stockart

Maor Schreiber

Pietro Amerio

David Carmel

Axel Cleeremans

Leon Deouell

Zoltan Dienes

Patxi Elosegi

Surya Gayet

Alon Goldstein

Adelina-Mihaela Halchin

Guido Hesselmann

Ruth Kimchi

Dominique Lamy

Leyla Loued-Khenissi

Sascha Meyen

Nitzan Micher

Michael Pitts

Roy Salomon

Kristian Sandberg

Iris A. Schnepf

Aaron Schurger

David R. Shanks

David Soto

Amir Tal

Darinka Trübutschek

Miguel A. Vadillo

Simon van Gaal

Itay Yaron

Zefan Zheng

Nathan Faivre

Liad Mudrik

Published

July 22, 2025

Doi
Abstract
The scope of unconscious processing has long been, and still remains, a hotly debated issue. This is driven in part by the current diversity of methods to manipulate and measure perceptual consciousness. Here, we provide ten recommendations and nine outstanding issues about designing experimental paradigms, analyzing data, and reporting the results of studies on unconscious processing. These were formed through dialogue among a group of researchers representing a range of theoretical backgrounds. We acknowledge that some of these recommendations naturally do not align with some existing approaches and are likely to change following theoretical and methodological development. Nevertheless, we hold that at this stage of the field they are instrumental in evoking a much-needed discussion about the norms of studying unconscious processes and helping researchers make more informed decisions when designing experiments. In the long run, we aim for this paper and future discussions around the outstanding issues to lead to a more convergent corpus of knowledge about the extent – and limits – of unconscious processing.